A rehashed comparison from a news aggregate site placed President Donald Trump beside President Jimmy Carter in what proved a reminder to many how “DRUDGE sold out years ago.” Much like Republicans in name only (RINOs), myriad once-reliable media outlets have shifted gears or changed hands over the years, allowing owners to wear the conservative reputation of the past like a skinsuit. Counted among them is the Drudge Report, which leveraged the malaise under Carter to present a dire outlook for the Trump administration as the website’s lead. Featuring the present and past chief executives side by side, the banner read, “TRUMP APPROVAL: 32% … MATCHING CARTER LOWS .. MORE WAR CONFUSION.” Oblivious to the radical leftward shift of the aggregate site, a social media user demonstrated how the once go-to for conservatives was being used for spin by commenting, “MAGA Simps will dismiss this headline by calling it ‘left wing propaganda’. I cannot wait to see their faces when they find out this was the morning headline on The Drudge Report.” MAGA Simps will dismiss this headline by calling it “left wing propaganda”. I cannot wait to see their faces when they find out this was the morning headline on The Drudge Report.#DV1 #USDemocracy #DemsUnited pic.twitter.com/SFcoS6nakc — Marty Taylor (@RealMartyT7) April 21, 2026 The first link led to an American Research Group poll that found Trump at his lowest approval rating during his entire tenure in the White House. “A total of 32% of Americans say they approve of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president, and 63% say they disapprove of the way Trump is handling his job, according to the latest survey from the American Research Group,” read the poll summary. “In March, 34% of Americans approved of the way Trump was handling his

Leftists set their sights on the Supreme Court after a lower court ruled in favor of upholding a Texas law regarding the Ten Commandments and schools. “This is a great day for those who believe in the Word of God.” Late last year, President Bill Clinton-appointed U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Judge Orlando L. Garcia ruled against Texas’ Senate Bill 10 in support of claims that it violated the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause. Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected those claims and the defunct “Lemon test” used to support them, allowing for the mandate that the Ten Commandments be displayed in schools where provided stands. In a 9-8 decision on Nathan v. Alamo Heights ISD, the court determined, “We conclude the Texas law does not violate either the Establishment Clause or the Free Exercise Clause,” as the jurists rejected arguments that display of the Ten Commandments in classrooms proselytizes or amounts to government-backed religious indoctrination. “S.B. 10 looks nothing like a historical religious establishment,” read the ruling. “It does not tell churches or synagogues or mosques what to believe or how to worship or whom to employ as priests, rabbis, or imams. It punishes no one who rejects the Ten Commandments, no matter the reason. It levies no taxes to support any clergy. It does not co-opt churches to perform civic functions. These are the kind of things ‘establishments of religion’ did at the founding. S.B. 10 does none of them.” It further stated with regard to the Establishment Clause that the law “requires no religious exercise or observance. Students are neither catechized on the Commandments nor taught to adopt them. Nor are teachers commanded to proselytize students who ask about the displays or contradict students who disagree with them.” Given the