Toronto Police Cause Confusion With Post About Missing “Woman” With A Goatee Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News, Toronto Police caused confusion on Twitter after posting about a missing ‘woman’ despite the accompanying picture showing a biological male with a goatee. “News Release – Missing Woman, Ryerson Avenue and Bathurst Street area, Isobella Degrace, 27,” stated the Twitter post. “She is described as 5’10″, with a thin build, shaggy blonde hair, and a full goatee,” the Toronto Police Service said. “She was last seen wearing a black t-shirt and grey pants.” Apparently, observing Canada’s gender identification rules is more important than accurately describing a missing person. News Release – Missing Woman, Ryerson Avenue and Bathurst Street area, Isobella Degrace, 27https://t.co/JB42sCtzxY pic.twitter.com/SO1VNr16NY — Toronto Police (@TorontoPolice) June 30, 2022 Respondents on Twitter were quick to chime in. Missing dog. Please help. pic.twitter.com/3NLx9gPDuT — Aldous Huxley’s Ghost™ (@AF632) June 30, 2022 Has anyone seen my cat? pic.twitter.com/7o8qCEneSG — Richard Leader (@RichardLeader) June 30, 2022 “How are we supposed to find her when you post a picture of a dude?” asked another respondent. “How would you describe this woman on the radio or via text?” asked another. “If you laugh, it’s a hate crime,” joked one person. Despite the stupidity, Isobella Degrace was eventually located by authorities about 9 hours after posting the tweet. *  *  * Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/ In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here. Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals. Tyler Durden Fri, 07/01/2022 – 10:25

“Pronouns Matter”: UK Bank’s Attempt To Virtue-Signal Backfires Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News, A subsidiary of a £886 billion net worth bank attempted to virtue signal by proclaiming “pronouns matter” alongside an image of an employee wearing a “she/her/hers” tag, but the stunt massively backfired on Twitter. “Pronouns matter. #ItsAPeopleThing,” tweeted Halifax Bank, which is owned by Lloyds Banking Group, one of the UK’s largest financial services organizations. Pronouns matter. #ItsAPeopleThing pic.twitter.com/vj9UdlBnLy — Halifax (@HalifaxBank) June 28, 2022 The topic immediately began trending on Twitter, with the vast majority of responses not displaying much sympathy towards the bank. “What if a Halifax employee doesn’t want to put pronouns on their lapel, perhaps because they reject the cult of gender ideology?” asked Simon Edge. “Will they be disadvantaged in any way? Barred from promotion? Fired?” What if a Halifax employee doesn’t want to put pronouns on their lapel, perhaps because they reject the cult of gender ideology? Will they be disadvantaged in any way? Barred from promotion? Fired? — Simon Edge (@simonjedge) June 28, 2022 His response garnered almost 4,000 likes. Edge linked to a video of a man who said he made the “biggest mistake of his life” by having his genitals removed to become transgender. “How are you so certain that removing your genitals … will solve your issues, those issues are going to wait for you when you wake up from surgery.” Ritchie Herron is suing the NHS after transitioning, he claims was fast-tracked into making ‘the biggest mistake of his life’. pic.twitter.com/8ZZk240M5U — Times Radio (@TimesRadio) June 28, 2022 “Are your staff able to opt out of this? Or do you sack them if they refuse?” asked Sarah Phillimore. are your staff able to opt out of this? Or do you sack them if

The Great Reset In Action: Ending Freedom Of The Press, Speech, & Expression Authored by Birsen Filip via The Mises Institute, Governments, corporations, and elites have always been fearful of the power of a free press, because it is capable of exposing their lies, destroying their carefully crafted images, and undermining their authority. In recent years, alternative journalism has been growing and more people are relying on social media platforms as sources of news and information. In response, the corporate state, digital conglomerates, and the mainstream media have been increasingly supportive of the silencing and censoring of alternative media outlets and voices that challenge the official narrative on most issues. At the recent World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, “Australian eSafety commissioner” Julie Inman Grant stated that “freedom of speech is not the same thing as a free for all,” and that “we are going to need a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online—from freedom of speech … to be free from online violence.” Meanwhile, the Canadian government is seeking to restrict independent media and the freedom of expression via the implementation of Bill C-11, which would allow it to regulate all online audiovisual platforms on the internet, including content on Spotify, Tik Tok, YouTube, and podcast clients. Similarly, the UK is seeking to introduce an Online Safety Bill, the US “paused” the establishment of a Disinformation Governance Board following backlash, and the European Union approved its own Digital Services Act, all of which aim to limit the freedom of speech. Attempts by elites and politicians to silence dissenters and critical thinkers is not something new. In fact, history is full of examples of “the persecution of men of science, the burning of scientific books, and the systematic eradication of the intelligentsia of the subjected people.” However, these current