{"id":686929,"date":"2026-10-15T16:59:20","date_gmt":"2026-10-15T16:59:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=686929"},"modified":"2026-10-15T16:59:20","modified_gmt":"2026-10-15T16:59:20","slug":"lib-leaning-court-hands-trump-admin-a-victory-over-california-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=686929","title":{"rendered":"Lib-leaning court hands Trump admin a victory over California law"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/div>\n

A liberal-leaning appeals court handed the Trump administration a major win for law enforcement on Wednesday.<\/p>\n

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a California law requiring plainclothes federal law enforcement to show badges and I.D. during operations.<\/p>\n

The court ruled that the Trump administration was \u201ccertain to succeed\u201d in its lawsuit against California, \u201cfinding that the No Vigilantes Act\u2019s identification requirement violates the Constitution\u2019s supremacy clause,\u201d Fox News reported.<\/p>\n

\n

\"\ud83d\udea8\" WINNING! THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUST BLOCKED CALIFORNIA\u2019S LAW TARGETING ICE AGENTS.<\/p>\n

Newsom\u2019s \u201cNo Vigilantes Act\u201d would have forced federal officers to VISIBLY DISPLAY ID during operations, or face CRIMINAL PROSECUTION by the state.<\/p>\n

The court ruled UNANIMOUSLY that it likely violates the SUPREMACY CLAUSE. California doesn\u2019t get to regulate the federal government.<\/p>\n

The judges went further and said the Trump administration is \u201cCERTAIN TO SUCCEED.\u201d<\/p>\n

Even an Obama appointee signed on.<\/p>\n

Federal law is the law of the land. Sacramento doesn\u2019t get a veto.<\/p>\n

GOOD.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Gunther Eagleman\"\u2122\" (@GuntherEagleman) October 15, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has \u201crepeatedly clashed with the Trump administration over some of its signature immigration policies, including blocking efforts to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities in 2018, restricting attempts to tighten asylum eligibility that same year and refusing to reinstate Trump\u2019s travel ban targeting several predominantly Muslim countries in 2017,\u201d according to Fox.<\/p>\n

The court\u2019s ruling was celebrated on X:<\/p>\n

\n

Good for the 9th circuit. Only in CA can criminals where a mask and no one says a word but law enforcement tries to protect their identity from lunatics who would gladly identify where they live and endanger the lives of their families. Protect those who protect us. Not criminals<\/p>\n

\u2014 Robert Lapinski (@RobLaArizonaSJB) October 14, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

The DOJ should demand to recover all costs, including attorney fees, from California under the Frivolous Lawsuit Exception. Even a first-year law student knows that there was no legal basis for this case.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Kev (@kevicss) October 14, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

California tried to slap name tags on ICE and the Ninth Circuit shut it down. Federal immigration law does not take orders from Sacramento.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Paul of Legally Armed America (@Paul_of_LAA) October 14, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

A spokesperson for Governor Gavin Newsom gave a brief statement.<\/p>\n

\u201cCalifornia is proud to fight for the safety of our communities against the federal government\u2019s campaign of terror and weaponized incompetence. Their tactics continue to harm our families every day,\u201d they said.<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A liberal-leaning appeals court handed the Trump administration a major win for law enforcement on Wednesday. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a California law requiring plainclothes federal law enforcement to show badges and I.D. during operations. The court ruled that the Trump administration was \u201ccertain to succeed\u201d in its lawsuit against California,… Continue reading Lib-leaning court hands Trump admin a victory over California law<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,22,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-686929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-border-security","category-immigration","category-immigration-reform","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/686929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=686929"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/686929\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=686929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=686929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=686929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}