{"id":671686,"date":"2026-09-20T21:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-09-20T21:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=671686"},"modified":"2026-09-20T21:30:00","modified_gmt":"2026-09-20T21:30:00","slug":"not-enough-raw-material-resource-wars-put-tungsten-in-crosshairs-as-western-rearmament-supercycle-looms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=671686","title":{"rendered":"“Not Enough Raw Material!” – Resource Wars Put Tungsten In Crosshairs As Western Rearmament Supercycle Looms"},"content":{"rendered":"

“Not Enough Raw Material!” – Resource Wars Put Tungsten In Crosshairs As Western Rearmament Supercycle Looms<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Submitted by Almonty Industries CEO Lewis Black,\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

The UK just invested \u00a371m to restart a tungsten mine,\u00a0with an option on half the output. Other governments will follow. I should be pleased \u2013 I’ve spent years arguing the West needs to fund its own supply.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The problem is I’ve seen what happens next<\/strong>. In 2008, Japan and South Korea poured billions into securing critical mineral supply chains. They funded projects across Australia and Canada. The result: no material produced. The money went to a generation of junior mining executives. I remember them on their boats in Monaco \u2013 very grateful, very happy. Governments have good ideas. The people they back to deliver on them are sometimes another matter.<\/p>\n

The challenge is that a government is a jack of all trades \u2013 it can’t tell a good mine from a bad one<\/strong>, so it hires engineers who write glowing feasibility reports with a waiver in the small print. And there is no shortage of people who call themselves management. Most of them are clowns who shouldn’t be left alone with a box of matches.<\/p>\n

Japan and South Korea learned<\/strong>. They stopped trying to pick winners and pushed the risk onto their industrial base \u2013 the companies that buy the stuff. Those companies know how to protect a dollar. If the new money follows that model, the checks might land somewhere useful this time.<\/p>\n

Tungsten markets<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Michael Dornhofer, ISBP \u2013 assessment as of 11 September, 2026<\/em><\/p>\n

Tungsten prices in the USA and Europe stay unchanged for another week and are still around 3000 USD\/mtu WO3<\/strong>. Reports from China show their domestic price trend moved to an upward tendency.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The reason is quite simple: There is not enough raw material<\/strong>! As the APT price in China is only about one third of the western price, Chinese APT producers are not willing to buy western concentrates on western price level. But without a significant amount of imported raw material, the industry is running short on raw material. Soon it will become clear whether the Chinese domestic prices will go up towards western levels, or China might reduce output of downstream products for export.<\/p>\n

The coming weeks will show us. And there’s another interesting development that even some “experts” overlooked<\/strong>. On 5 August, China placed several foreign entities under sanctions\u00a0and banned them from operating in China. One entity on this list is the non-profit organization RBA.<\/p>\n

RBA (Responsible Business Alliance) is the world’s largest industry coalition dedicated to promoting responsible business conduct. RBA has more than 600 member companies including Apple, Tesla, Microsoft, Amazon etc. and runs the RMI (Responsible Minerals Initiative) program.<\/p>\n

Nearly the entire western downstream industry insists on RMI certificates for their total supply chain<\/strong>. When, due to the ban of RBA, no RMI audits and certificates are possible in China, western downstream producers cannot accept any tungsten material or downstream products coming out of China.<\/p>\n

China wants to replace the RMI audits by audits performed by CCCMC<\/strong> (Chinese Chamber of Commerce for Metals & Chemicals). But knowing that China imports thousands of tonnes of concentrate from countries like Myanmar and North Korea, and so material from these countries are in the tungsten supply chain in China, it’s questionable who would trust Chinese audit certificates.<\/p>\n

So, this easy-to-overlook new regulation in China could lead to an additional “firewall” between China and RoW, which might have a very significant effect on the tungsten world market.<\/p>\n

Michael Dornhofer is founder of ISBP (Independent Supply Business Partner) in Graz, Austria. <\/em>He has spent more than 20 years in tungsten<\/em><\/strong>, including 13 years at Wolfram Bergbau und H\u00fctten, Sandvik’s tungsten business, and has worked as an independent agent and consultant to the tungsten and hard metal industry since 2019.<\/em><\/p>\n

From January, the door shuts<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Since 2023, the Pentagon has barred Chinese, Russian, Iranian and North Korean tungsten from defense contracts. From 1 January 2027, that restriction moves upstream.<\/strong> It will no longer matter where the tungsten was melted or processed<\/strong>. What matters is where it was mined. Ore, feedstock, recycled material: if it started life in one of those four countries, it is out. The route that kept the loophole open \u2013 mine in China, process somewhere friendlier, sell it as non-Chinese \u2013 closes for good.<\/p>\n

That’s the American side. On the other side, producer countries are shutting their own doors<\/strong>.\u00a0Zimbabwe banned exports of tungsten ore and concentrates in July,\u00a0confirmed by the Ministry of Mines and reported by Bloomberg last week.\u00a0Vietnam’s industry ministry has drafted a proposal to pull tungsten off the permitted-export list entirely. Vietnam is the world’s second-largest producer, at around 3,400 tonnes a year. If that draft becomes law, the non-China supply pool gets a lot smaller.<\/p>\n

Zimbabwe barely produces any tungsten. The volume is negligible. But the pattern is worth watching<\/strong> \u2013 one more producer country pulling raw material off the open market. The list of places you can actually buy tungsten outside China keeps getting shorter.<\/p>\n

Opinion<\/strong><\/h2>\n

People ask why we don’t branch out. Gold is on a run. Lithium gets headlines. Every commodity has someone telling you it’s the one to watch. <\/strong>We do tungsten and molybdenum. We don’t know anything else \u2013 and I would rather say that than pretend otherwise.<\/p>\n

A vet treats everything that walks through the door. Dogs, cats, parrots. A doctor specializes. The guy who whips out your appendix does not do brain surgery, unless you’re on a budget.<\/p>\n

Mining is the same. Every deposit has its own geology, its own metallurgy, its own set of problems you only discover once you are underground. The companies that chase whatever commodity is fashionable learn everything at surface level and nothing underneath. We have been at this long enough to know what we don’t know \u2013 and we don’t know gold or lithium or anything that’s not a refractory metal.<\/p>\n

We are the doctor.<\/p>\n

In the media<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The <\/em>analysts have arrived.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Jefferies has initiated coverage of Almonty with a Buy rating<\/a>, citing the tightening tungsten market<\/strong> and the growing need for supply outside China. With the shares up considerably over the past year, interest in both Almonty and tungsten has clearly moved on.<\/p>\n

What matters now is execution \u2013 bringing new supply into a market that badly needs it.<\/strong><\/p>\n

*\u00a0 *\u00a0 *<\/p>\n

On the tungsten news<\/strong> front, Almonty partnered with Rwanda’s government<\/a> last Monday, securing a foothold in Africa’s largest tungsten-producing nation. By Thursday, the miner, which expects to become the leading Western producer of conflict-free tungsten (ex-China),<\/strong> tapped<\/a> Swedish mining equipment maker Sandvik’s Wolfram Bergbau und H\u00fctten AG unit to process existing tailings from its Los Santos mine in western Spain.<\/p>\n

As last week’s news proved, Almonty’s move is about bringing the most immediately available tungsten supply to the West<\/strong> as resource wars and China’s critical materials chokehold<\/a> on the world collide with the US rearmament supercycle set to kick off in the near term.<\/p>\n

In other words, the West doesn’t have the time to open new mines.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

via\u00a0Christian Keller, Barclays’ global head of economics research<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Without critical materials<\/strong>, the West’s rearmament supercycle, reindustrialization, data center buildouts and a nearly endless list of other projects would not be possible. Wall Street should refocus on producing miners that can deliver today because they’re the ones providing the\u00a0building blocks that make\u00a0Western reindustrialization possible<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nSun, 09\/20\/2026 – 17:30<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Not Enough Raw Material!” – Resource Wars Put Tungsten In Crosshairs As Western Rearmament Supercycle Looms Submitted by Almonty Industries CEO Lewis Black,\u00a0 The UK just invested \u00a371m to restart a tungsten mine,\u00a0with an option on half the output. Other governments will follow. I should be pleased \u2013 I’ve spent years arguing the West needs… Continue reading “Not Enough Raw Material!” – Resource Wars Put Tungsten In Crosshairs As Western Rearmament Supercycle Looms<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,22,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-671686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-border-security","category-immigration","category-immigration-reform","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/671686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=671686"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/671686\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=671686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=671686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=671686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}