{"id":638824,"date":"2026-07-21T07:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T07:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=638824"},"modified":"2026-07-21T07:30:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T07:30:00","slug":"proposed-us-deal-for-saudi-nuclear-enrichment-is-without-safeguards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=638824","title":{"rendered":"Proposed US Deal For Saudi Nuclear Enrichment Is Without Safeguards"},"content":{"rendered":"

Proposed US Deal For Saudi Nuclear Enrichment Is Without Safeguards<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Via Middle East Eye<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The Trump administration has greenlit\u00a0Saudi Arabia’s\u00a0nuclear enrichment project, but with no safeguards in place to prevent the development of a bomb, CNN reported<\/strong> on Friday.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The draft deal, viewed by the news outlet, showed Washington’s support for Riyadh\u2019s civilian nuclear program is still awaiting President Donald Trump\u2019s signature<\/strong>, despite US-Saudi negotiations concluding in October.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"
via AFP<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

<\/p>\n

Unnamed officials cited in the story indicated that the documents, which include the mandatory “123 agreement” and safeguards protocols, have not yet been sent to Congress, potentially for fear of bipartisan pushback.<\/p>\n

It is unclear how long the president will wait, given Congress is likely to switch hands to a Democratic majority after the November elections, stymying his policy agenda.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and his advisors have long pushed for a deal that would allow them to enrich uranium, which they say the kingdom holds vast reserves of.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will enrich it and we will sell it and we will do a \u2018yellowcake’,”<\/strong> Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman said last year, referring to a step in the process that comes after mining but before enrichment.<\/p>\n

Nuclear umbrella<\/h2>\n

The Saudi push to be included under the US\u2019s nuclear umbrella was a key issue during the Saudi crown prince’s visit to the White House in November last year.\u00a0Days after Israel attacked Hamas negotiators in Qatar earlier in the year, Saudi Arabia signed a defence pact with Pakistan, the only nuclear-armed state in the Muslim world.<\/p>\n

Pakistan is estimated to possess around 170 nuclear warheads<\/strong>. Saudi and Pakistani descriptions of the deal said it encompassed all military options.<\/p>\n

The Americans\u2019 nuclear talks with Saudi Arabia have been kept under tight wraps, but one former US intelligence official previously told Middle East Eye that the idea of extending protection to the kingdom could serve a purpose. \u201cIt would pull them out of the Pakistanis\u2019 nuclear umbrella<\/strong> and make the Saudis feel better than the Qataris,” he said at the time.<\/p>\n

In February, the Trump administration notified Congress it is pursuing a civil nuclear pact with Riyadh that does not include non-proliferation safeguards it has traditionally imposed on countries to prevent them from developing nuclear weapons.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The language in the document also leaves room for Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium, as it stipulates \u201cadditional safeguards and verification measures to the most sensitive areas of potential nuclear cooperation” between the two countries, including enrichment and reprocessing, the report said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

A nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia that does not explicitly prohibit the kingdom\u2019s potential to enrich uranium in the future would be much more transformative for the region than a separate deal for F-35 warplanes that the Trump administration is\u00a0pursuing<\/a>.\u00a0In nuclear agreements with foreign governments, for example, the\u00a0UAE<\/a>, the US made cooperation conditional on commitments that they will not enrich uranium or reprocess spent nuclear fuel.<\/p>\n

The UAE,\u00a0Morocco<\/a>\u00a0and dozens of European and Asian countries have signed the so-called “123 Agreements” with the US. US law generally requires a 123 Agreement to be in force before licensing significant exports of US-origin nuclear material or equipment to a foreign country.<\/p>\n

\n

The reported deal would allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium domestically under a U.S.-Saudi nuclear cooperation agreement. Riyadh would sign a 123 agreement, but apparently without first adopting the IAEA Additional Protocol. https:\/\/t.co\/G4X66hJRAq<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Nicole Grajewski (@NicoleGrajewski) July 19, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In addition to a 123 Agreement, US lawmakers have insisted that the US require Saudi Arabia to submit to what is called the “Additional Protocol”, which allows the United Nations\u2019 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) additional access to nuclear facilities, data, and undeclared sites.<\/p>\n

The UAE, the only other Gulf state to have officially partnered with the US in nuclear energy, signed the Additional Protocol to its IAEA agreement in 2009.<\/p>\n

Reuters reported, however, that the Trump administration sent a preliminary report to some heads of congressional committees in November, which it is required to send if it is not pursuing the Additional Protocol. The Reuters report underscores how Trump is putting deal-making at the centre of his diplomacy, even if it means chafing at the traditional concerns of the US foreign policy establishment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nTue, 07\/21\/2026 – 03:30<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Proposed US Deal For Saudi Nuclear Enrichment Is Without Safeguards Via Middle East Eye The Trump administration has greenlit\u00a0Saudi Arabia’s\u00a0nuclear enrichment project, but with no safeguards in place to prevent the development of a bomb, CNN reported on Friday.\u00a0 The draft deal, viewed by the news outlet, showed Washington’s support for Riyadh\u2019s civilian nuclear program… Continue reading Proposed US Deal For Saudi Nuclear Enrichment Is Without Safeguards<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":638825,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[20,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-638824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economic-empowerment","category-national-security","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=638824"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/638824\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/638825"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=638824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=638824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=638824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}