{"id":623212,"date":"2026-06-22T18:55:26","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T18:55:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=623212"},"modified":"2026-06-22T18:55:26","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T18:55:26","slug":"supreme-court-move-could-force-police-into-race-based-decisions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=623212","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court move could force police into race-based decisions"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"630\" src=\"https:\/\/americanwirenews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/SG-Clarence-Thomas-1200x630.jpg\" class=\"attachment-facebook size-facebook wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/><\/div>\n<p>Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito believe the Supreme Court should take up a case that could create separate rules for minorities.<\/p>\n<p>Issuing their dissent on the refusal to hear the U.S. v. Donte J. Carter, the pair blasted the potential dangers of treating people differently based on their race.<\/p>\n<p>Carter\u2019s firearm and theft-related convictions were vacated after the D.C. Court of Appeals found that police held him before having any reason to do so, despite him being in possession of a .40-caliber handgun that was allegedly stolen from an FBI agent\u2019s vehicle. When police asked Carter if he was carrying a weapon, he lied and said he was not. Upon pulling his pants up, officers noted that he had a suspicious bulge in his pants, which appeared to take the \u201cL\u201d shape of a handgun, the same gun that would be later identified as the stolen pistol.<\/p>\n<p>The court argued that \u201cblack Americans like [Carter] are \u2018especially distrustful of law enforcement\u2019\u201d which causes them to be \u201c\u2018less likely\u2019 than other people \u2018to terminate a police encounter\u2019 due to skepticism that any attempt to exercise their constitutional rights will be respected.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>They further claimed that his race was a key component in the case, and that race in general plays a role in how people react to police encounters. Ultimately, the seizure was ruled unconstitutional because the officers involved were deemed to have not established reasonable suspicion.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is dangerous to allow an individual to be treated differently based on statistics, studies, or expert testimony that purports to show that members of the racial or ethnic group to which he belongs are more likely to act in a certain way than are members of other groups. Here, the special treatment helped the individual; in other situations, it will not,\u201d Alito wrote.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnder the test, officers will need to quickly assess a person\u2019s race, and if officers and courts must craft special rules for black persons, what about dark-skinned Latinos, other Latinos, and members of other minority groups?\u201d he asked. \u201cWe have said that our \u2019Constitution is color-blind.\u2019 It \u2018almost never\u2019 allows government actors to treat persons differently based on their race.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd we have rejected the proposition that the Constitution permits an individual to be treated differently based on a \u2018perception that members of the same racial group \u2014 regardless of their age, education, economic status, or the community in which they live \u2014 think alike,&#8217;\u201d his argument continued, citing Shaw v. Reno.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/americanwirenews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/SG-Clarence-Thomas-1200x630.jpg\" title=\"Supreme Court move could force police into race-based decisions\" \/><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito believe the Supreme Court should take up a case that could create separate rules for minorities. Issuing their dissent on the refusal to hear the U.S. v. Donte J. Carter, the pair blasted the potential dangers of treating people differently based on their race. Carter\u2019s firearm and theft-related convictions&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=623212\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Supreme Court move could force police into race-based decisions<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":623213,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[20,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-623212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economic-empowerment","category-national-security","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/623212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=623212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/623212\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/623213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=623212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=623212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=623212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}