{"id":623049,"date":"2026-06-22T13:05:02","date_gmt":"2026-06-22T13:05:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=623049"},"modified":"2026-06-22T13:05:02","modified_gmt":"2026-06-22T13:05:02","slug":"critics-warn-new-california-bill-could-bury-government-secrets-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=623049","title":{"rendered":"Critics warn new California bill could bury government secrets"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/div>\n

Leftist lawmakers were accused of taking a \u201cbackward step toward unaccountability\u201d after a change to a state bill appeared aimed \u201cto thwart transparency.\u201d<\/p>\n

In case objections to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and ongoing fraud investigations hadn\u2019t already demonstrated Democrats\u2019 desire to maintain secrecy, public records requests may soon be subject to fees and potential court scrutiny in California.<\/p>\n

As it concerns California Assembly Bill 1821<\/a>, Assemblymember Blanca Pacheco (D) amended the language that the legislation no longer seeks to just extend the timeline of responses to record requests, but also provides court oversight on top of administrative and \u201cprofessional\u201d fees.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt would be easily weaponized by agencies seeking to thwart transparency and accountability, as has already happened elsewhere in the country,\u201d said First Amendment Coalition executive director David Snyder in a report<\/a> by the California Post.<\/p>\n

Under the latest version of the bill, an administrative fee of $22.35 per hour could be imposed, as well as a $66.26 per hour \u201cprofessional fee\u201d for time staff is required to facilitate record requests, both subject to cost-of-living increases. Additionally, if a request is perceived as \u201cmalicious intent\u201d by the government, the request would then be subject to court oversight, leading to a potential hold for review.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor decades, California law has been clear that state and local agencies cannot sue records requesters,\u201d remarked Snyder. \u201cThe fundamentals of democracy are being tested now in America. It is exactly the wrong time for California to take the serious backward step toward unaccountability.\u201d<\/p>\n

In response to the framing of the legislative effort, a spokesperson for Pacheco argued to the Post that the bill is meant to address unreasonable records requests made to smaller government entities, especially as artificial intelligence has increased the ease with which such steps can be made.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe malicious-intent provision is intended to address the rare circumstances which the Public Records Act is being used to disrupt agency operations, harass staff, or consume disproportionate public resources without a corresponding public benefit,\u201d said the spokesperson.<\/p>\n

Speaking in support of the legislation, California State Association of Counties CEO Graham Knaus made the case that court involvement would be rare and said, \u201cWe believe that taxpayers should not be forced to bear the cost of an AI business model for those that are attempting to overwhelm the ability of local governments to provide services to our residents.\u201d<\/p>\n

The new language of AB 1821 comes as California also faces backlash over lawmakers\u2019 alleged stand against transparency following the introduction of Assembly Bill 2624, dubbed the \u201cStop Nick Shirley Act<\/a>,\u201d described as criminalizing investigative journalism.<\/p>\n

Worth noting, Pacheco also happens to be a leader of the Legislature\u2019s Joint Rules Committee, with state Sen. John Laird (D) responsible for managing the Capitol Annex Project, which has repeatedly been called out over a lack of transparency.<\/p>\n

\n

Reporter calls out Newsom about his own $1.1B \u2018ballroom\u2019 equivalent cloaked in secrecy, his response says it all https:\/\/t.co\/nVZYJjPLWZ<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 BPR (@BIZPACReview) October 29, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Leftist lawmakers were accused of taking a \u201cbackward step toward unaccountability\u201d after a change to a state bill appeared aimed \u201cto thwart transparency.\u201d In case objections to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and ongoing fraud investigations hadn\u2019t already demonstrated Democrats\u2019 desire to maintain secrecy, public records requests may soon be subject to fees and… Continue reading Critics warn new California bill could bury government secrets<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":623033,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,22,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-623049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-border-security","category-immigration","category-immigration-reform","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/623049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=623049"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/623049\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/623033"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=623049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=623049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=623049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}