{"id":621507,"date":"2026-06-19T12:35:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T12:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=621507"},"modified":"2026-06-19T12:35:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-19T12:35:00","slug":"gabbard-drops-fauci-covid-19-receipts-on-last-day-he-funded-the-research-cooked-the-cover-story-then-lied-to-congress","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=621507","title":{"rendered":"Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts On Last Day: He Funded The Research, Cooked The Cover Story, Then Lied To Congress"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden\">Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts On Last Day: He Funded The Research, Cooked The Cover Story, Then Lied To Congress<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item\">\n<p>Newly declassified <a href=\"https:\/\/www.odni.gov\/index.php\/newsroom\/press-releases\/press-releases-2026\/4166-pr-11-26\">documents<\/a>\u00a0released Thursday by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard show that a U.S. national laboratory assessed the COVID-19 lab-origin hypothesis as a serious possibility as early as May 2020, as well as\u00a0<strong>evidence\u00a0of U.S.-funded coronavirus research<\/strong> that included <strong>planning for spike-protein modifications, receptor-adaptation experiments, and testing in humanized mice<\/strong> in collaboration with researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.<\/p>\n<p>The documents also prove that Anthony Fauci lied under oath.\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\" xml:lang=\"en\">Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I\u2019m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/ZMdliW4zyS\">pic.twitter.com\/ZMdliW4zyS<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/DNIGabbard\/status\/2067792184753938484?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 19, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The release, issued on Gabbard\u2019s last day on the job, includes an eight-page May 27, 2020, assessment from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory\u2019s Z Program. That assessment concluded that \u201c<strong>all of the necessary conditions for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus &#8211; specifically a coronavirus adapted to recognize human cell receptors &#8211; were present at the Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology in mid-to-late 2019<\/strong>.\u201d It assigned equal weight to a laboratory-modification hypothesis and a natural-origin scenario.<\/p>\n<p><a data-image-external-href=\"\" data-image-href=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/inline-images\/conditions.jpg?itok=vpUekjLY\" data-link-option=\"0\" href=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/inline-images\/conditions.jpg?itok=vpUekjLY\"><\/a><\/p>\n<figure role=\"group\" class=\"caption caption-img inline-images image-style-inline-images\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" data-entity-type=\"file\" data-entity-uuid=\"167ddecf-7381-4a9b-b241-45ee3603b4d0\" data-responsive-image-style=\"inline_images\" height=\"349\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/styles\/inline_image_mobile\/public\/inline-images\/conditions.jpg?itok=vpUekjLY\" width=\"500\" \/><figcaption><em>Screenshot, ODNI <a href=\"https:\/\/www.odni.gov\/files\/\/documents\/Newsroom\/Reports%20and%20Pubs\/COVID-19_Release_DNI_Gabbard_6-18_Part-1.pdf\">release<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile,\u00a0<strong>Recall that while the government was locking us down, Dr. Anthony Fauci and those in his orbit were <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2023\/01\/19\/covid-origin-nih-emails\/\">actively fabricating<\/a> a &#8216;wet market&#8217; narrative<\/strong>\u00a0that would conceal US research as a possible origin &#8211; despite his own advisors initially insisting that COVID-19 looked manmade.<\/p>\n<p>In his January 2024 transcribed interview, <strong>Fauci was asked about conversations concerning the same three topics &#8211; COVID origins, WIV, and EcoHealth<\/strong>. When asked about the CIA, he answered yes: he said he was briefed \u201conce or twice\u201d in a secure NIH facility and also recalled a briefing in a White House situation room.<\/p>\n<p>The newly released documents then <strong>show a June 4, 2021 briefing involving CIA\/WCP personnel, NSC officials, and Fauci<\/strong>, during which Fauci offered views on pangolin research, sick WIV researchers, single-lineage vs. multi-lineage evidence, and recommended scientists for the IC to contact. A separate CIA-context email says that same 40-minute secure video teleconfrenece involved CIA\/WCPMC officials and that <strong>Fauci gave thoughts on the 4 May 2021 COVID-origin briefing and recommended U.S. scientists to consult.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a data-image-external-href=\"\" data-image-href=\"\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/during_0.jpg?itok=xGTUagnd\" data-link-option=\"0\" href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/during_0.jpg?itok=xGTUagnd\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-entity-type=\"file\" data-entity-uuid=\"4693e292-47fb-41d9-a7db-4b3bbbd2fe4a\" data-responsive-image-style=\"inline_images\" height=\"153\" width=\"500\" class=\"inline-images image-style-inline-images\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/styles\/inline_image_mobile\/public\/inline-images\/during_0.jpg?itok=xGTUagnd\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>So, he lied.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to a statement released with the files, &#8220;<strong>Fauci worked with politicized career leadership in the Intelligence Community (IC) to suppress the truth about his actions<\/strong>, the virus\u2019 lab-leak origins, and his role in directing U.S. funding for this dangerous research that caused immeasurable harm and countless lost lives. <strong>These documents expose Fauci\u2019s direct role in influencing and manipulating IC assessments on COVID-19, and how Fauci lied to Congress in 2024<\/strong>, when under oath he denied knowledge of or participation in discussions with intelligence officials about viral research.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>U.S.-Funded Research and Planning for Coronavirus Manipulation<\/h2>\n<p>The files include the Year 5 progress report for EcoHealth Alliance\u2019s NIH grant 5R01AI110964-05. Under Specific Aim 3, the project outlined plans to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Sequence spike genes from bat coronaviruses.<\/li>\n<li>Create mutants to assess how much further evolution would be needed for efficient use of human ACE2 or other receptors.<\/li>\n<li>Conduct receptor-mutant pseudovirus binding assays.<\/li>\n<li>Perform infection experiments in cell lines and humanized mice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>This research track overlaps with work described in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/political\/defense-bill-requires-trump-spy-agencies-declassify-covid-19-origins-intel-chinese\">2018 DEFUSE proposal<\/a>, which involved EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina, and Shi Zhengli\u2019s team at WIV.<\/strong> The proposal sought to create chimeric bat coronaviruses with enhanced human infectivity, including consideration of furin cleavage site insertion to improve lung-cell entry, and to test the resulting viruses in humanized mice originally developed in Baric\u2019s lab.<\/p>\n<p>A 2016 WIV paper included in the release describes a synthetic shuttle vector system for assembling large DNA fragments, with demonstrated capability up to 31 kilobases. The authors presented the method as a tool for \u201cgenome-scale DNA reconstruction,\u201d a technique relevant to synthetic biology and virus engineering.<\/p>\n<p>Surveillance work under the same NIH grant reported that 9 of 1,497 rural residents in southern China (0.6%) were seropositive for bat SARS-related or HKU10 coronaviruses.<\/p>\n<p>And from leaked emails three years ago:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em>Among other things, the NIH helped fund experiments at WIV t<strong>hat infected genetically engineered mice with \u201cchimeric\u201d hybrids of SARS-related bat coronaviruses <\/strong>in what some scientists have described as <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/09\/09\/covid-origins-gain-of-function-research\/\">unacceptably risky research<\/a>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Andersen laid them out plainly in an email to Fauci that same evening. \u201c<strong>The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (\u201d Andersen wrote in the email. \u201cI should mention,\u201d he added, \u201cthat after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike and myself a<\/strong><strong>ll find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory<\/strong>. But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.\u201d &#8211;<a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2023\/01\/19\/covid-origin-nih-emails\/\">The Intercept<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2>Internal Discussions and Awareness of Manipulation Research<\/h2>\n<p>A June 8, 2021, internal email in the release references a 2016 New York Academy of Medicine meeting at which Peter <strong>Daszak reportedly discussed colleagues in China \u201cmanipulating the spike protein on coronavirus to make them more virulent.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Other 2020\u20132021 emails show officials debating technical concerns, <strong>including references to a DOD report on a \u201csuspicious added furin-site\u201d<\/strong> and FBI reporting containing unusual genetic descriptions. One analyst noted the risk that non-experts could misinterpret technical data while still calling for scrutiny. Another observed that \u201cthe IC took direction straight from NIH\u2026 the people that funded the Wuhan Lab\u201d and referenced \u201ca complex web of money and politics influencing analysis.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Picking Their Reviewer<\/h2>\n<p>July 2021 emails concerning<strong> the selection of outside reviewers for COVID-origin assessments<\/strong> show officials rejecting several candidates for political sensitivity or conflict-of-interest reasons:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>James Clapper was viewed as too politically \u201chot.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Anthony Fauci was flagged due to his position as a \u201ccustomer\u201d of the assessment through NIH funding ties.<\/li>\n<li>Michael Morell was considered \u201ctoo public.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Sue Gordon and another individual identified only as \u201cBeth\u201d were also set aside.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>And so&#8230;\u00a0<\/h2>\n<p>These materials provide primary-source documentation that <strong>a U.S. national laboratory assessed a laboratory origin as equally plausible to natural emergence at a time when prominent scientific publications were publicly emphasizing a natural zoonotic source<\/strong> and characterizing alternative hypotheses as conspiracy theories. This includes the February 2020 Lancet <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lancet\/article\/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9\/fulltext\">letter<\/a> and the March 2020 Nature Medicine <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41591-020-0820-9\">paper<\/a> \u201cThe Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2\u201d, along with subsequent amplification by NIH leadership.<\/p>\n<p>The research details in the declassified grant reports and proposals involved techniques and modifications &#8211; spike-protein engineering, receptor adaptation, humanized-mouse testing, and consideration of furin cleavage sites &#8211; that later featured prominently in scientific debate over SARS-CoV-2\u2019s characteristics.<\/p>\n<p><a data-image-external-href=\"\" data-image-href=\"\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/daszak%20shi_0_5.jpg?itok=l88bOqAS\" data-link-option=\"0\" href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/daszak%20shi_0_5.jpg?itok=l88bOqAS\"><\/a><\/p>\n<figure role=\"group\" class=\"caption caption-img inline-images image-style-inline-images\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" data-entity-type=\"file\" data-entity-uuid=\"92188f7a-dd02-4217-8af7-8df1d63e3049\" data-responsive-image-style=\"inline_images\" height=\"314\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/styles\/inline_image_mobile\/public\/inline-images\/daszak%20shi_0_5.jpg?itok=l88bOqAS\" width=\"500\" \/><figcaption><em>Shi and Daszak clinking glasses, undoubtedly after lots of humanized mice successfully died horrible COVID deaths.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><\/p><\/div>\n<p>      <span class=\"field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden\"><a title=\"View user profile.\" href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/users\/tyler-durden\" lang=\"\" class=\"username\" xml:lang=\"\">Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden\">Fri, 06\/19\/2026 &#8211; 08:35<\/span><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/styles\/inline_image_mobile\/public\/inline-images\/conditions.jpg?itok=vpUekjLY\" title=\"Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts On Last Day: He Funded The Research, Cooked The Cover Story, Then Lied To Congress\" \/><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts On Last Day: He Funded The Research, Cooked The Cover Story, Then Lied To Congress Newly declassified documents\u00a0released Thursday by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard show that a U.S. national laboratory assessed the COVID-19 lab-origin hypothesis as a serious possibility as early as May 2020, as well as\u00a0evidence\u00a0of U.S.-funded&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=621507\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Gabbard Drops Fauci COVID-19 Receipts On Last Day: He Funded The Research, Cooked The Cover Story, Then Lied To Congress<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":621508,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[17,22,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-621507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-border-security","category-immigration","category-immigration-reform","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=621507"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621507\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/621508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=621507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=621507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=621507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}