{"id":619952,"date":"2026-06-16T22:25:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-16T22:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=619952"},"modified":"2026-06-16T22:25:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-16T22:25:00","slug":"supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-trumps-first-term-tariff-on-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=619952","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Trump&#8217;s First-Term Tariff On China"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden\">Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Trump&#8217;s First-Term Tariff On China<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/us\/supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-trumps-first-term-tariff-on-china-6048508?utm_source=partner&amp;utm_campaign=ZeroHedge\"><em>Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>The U.S. Supreme Court on June 15 declined to hear a legal challenge to tariffs imposed on Chinese imports by U.S. President Donald Trump during his first term in 2018.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a data-image-external-href=\"\" data-image-href=\"\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image%20%2857%29_12.jpg?itok=HP4ov3u1\" data-link-option=\"0\" href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image%20%2857%29_12.jpg?itok=HP4ov3u1\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" data-entity-type=\"file\" data-entity-uuid=\"ea38329c-0119-43e9-b6f2-d4977d670186\" data-responsive-image-style=\"inline_images\" height=\"333\" width=\"500\" class=\"inline-images image-style-inline-images\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/styles\/inline_image_mobile\/public\/inline-images\/image%20%2857%29_12.jpg?itok=HP4ov3u1\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The decision follows an appeal by HMTX Industries and other businesses after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit last year upheld the tariffs, which Trump previously imposed on Chinese goods under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 in response to China\u2019s unfair trade practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/25\/25-1012\/396854\/20260220120006407_25-___%20HMTX%20Petition%20for%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorari.pdf\">petitioned<\/a> the Supreme Court to review the ruling, but the high court <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/orders\/courtorders\/061526zor_5if6.pdf\">denied<\/a> the request on June 15, keeping the tariffs in place. <strong>The justices did not provide any explanation for the decision.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to a Feb. 20 petition filed by the importers, the first Trump administration imposed an initial round of tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese imports under Section 301 of the Trade Act.<\/p>\n<p>The administration later expanded the tariffs in response to China\u2019s retaliatory tariff measures by invoking Section 307 of the Trade Act, which allows the president to modify existing tariffs to address unfair trade practices.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>\u201cBut Congress nowhere gave USTR [Office of the United States Trade Representative] the vast power to engage in an open-ended trade war under that modest modification provision. Yet that is precisely what happened here,\u201d <\/strong>the importers said.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cThat USTR\u2019s \u2018modification\u2019 continues to impose billions of dollars in taxes on the American public each month is enough to warrant this court\u2019s review.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In a May <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/25\/25-1012\/408664\/20260512142854669_25-1012_HMTX_opp_final.pdf\">filing<\/a>, the administration argued that the case did not merit Supreme Court review and said<strong> the law allows the USTR to modify tariffs as long as the changes \u201care not radically transformative.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cAccordingly, modifications imposed under Section 307(a) necessarily comport with the Act\u2019s scheme because they are limited to actions appropriate to address the same problem that the original Section 301 actions addressed, as that problem has evolved over time,\u201d it stated.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>After taking office for a second term last year, Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on trading partners, citing the need to regulate international transactions to respond to an \u201cunusual and extraordinary threat\u201d to national security.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court struck down the tariffs in February, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/us\/5-takeaways-from-supreme-courts-rejection-of-trumps-tariffs-5988234\">ruling<\/a> that the IEEPA does not clearly authorize the president to impose tariffs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Trump administration has been looking at alternative legal avenues following the Supreme Court ruling.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>USTR Jamieson Greer <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/business\/ustr-will-launch-new-trade-probes-covering-major-trading-partners-greer-says-5988517\">said<\/a> on Feb. 20 that his office would launch new Section 301 investigations covering most major trading partners.<\/p>\n<p>The new trade investigations will cover various areas, including industrial excess capacity, forced labor, pharmaceutical pricing practices, discrimination against U.S. technology companies and digital goods and services, digital services taxes, and ocean pollution.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>      <span class=\"field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden\"><a title=\"View user profile.\" href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/users\/tyler-durden\" lang=\"\" class=\"username\" xml:lang=\"\">Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden\">Tue, 06\/16\/2026 &#8211; 18:25<\/span><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.zerohedge.com\/s3fs-public\/styles\/inline_image_mobile\/public\/inline-images\/image%20%2857%29_12.jpg?itok=HP4ov3u1\" title=\"Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Trump&apos;s First-Term Tariff On China\" \/><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Trump&#8217;s First-Term Tariff On China Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times, The U.S. Supreme Court on June 15 declined to hear a legal challenge to tariffs imposed on Chinese imports by U.S. President Donald Trump during his first term in 2018. The decision follows an appeal by HMTX&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=619952\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Supreme Court Rejects Challenge To Trump&#8217;s First-Term Tariff On China<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":619953,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[20,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-619952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economic-empowerment","category-national-security","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619952","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=619952"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/619952\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/619953"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=619952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=619952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=619952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}