{"id":617868,"date":"2026-06-13T01:20:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T01:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=617868"},"modified":"2026-06-13T01:20:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T01:20:00","slug":"americas-hiring-map-has-flipped-since-2020-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=617868","title":{"rendered":"America’s Hiring Map Has Flipped Since 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"

America’s Hiring Map Has Flipped Since 2020<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

America\u2019s hiring recovery has split into sharply different regional stories since 2020.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Some states, including Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas, continue seeing elevated hiring demand years after the pandemic. Others, particularly across parts of the West Coast and Mountain West, have experienced steep declines in job openings.<\/p>\n

The map below, via Visual Capitalist’s Dorothy Neufeld,<\/a> shows how job openings changed in every state between February 2020 and January 2026, based on data from the\u00a0U.S. Chamber of Commerce<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The contrast is especially striking in the Mountain West. Idaho leads the nation with hiring demand up over 20%, while neighboring Wyoming ranks last at -39%.<\/p>\n

Where Job Openings Have Increased the Most<\/h2>\n

The rankings below show the change in job openings since 2020 by state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Rank<\/th>\nState<\/th>\nChange in Job Openings
\n\t\t\tFeb 2020 vs Jan 2026<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nIdaho<\/td>\n20.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nMississippi<\/td>\n19.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nOklahoma<\/td>\n18.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nGeorgia<\/td>\n16.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nTexas<\/td>\n14.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nOhio<\/td>\n9.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nMissouri<\/td>\n9.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nMinnesota<\/td>\n9.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nDistrict of Columbia<\/td>\n6.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nLouisiana<\/td>\n4.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nSouth Carolina<\/td>\n3.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nArkansas<\/td>\n1.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nConnecticut<\/td>\n1.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nTennessee<\/td>\n0.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nDelaware<\/td>\n0.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nKansas<\/td>\n0.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nAlabama<\/td>\n-1.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nNorth Carolina<\/td>\n-1.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nFlorida<\/td>\n-1.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nRhode Island<\/td>\n-4.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nVirginia<\/td>\n-4.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nMichigan<\/td>\n-5.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nKentucky<\/td>\n-6.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nNorth Dakota<\/td>\n-8.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\nUtah<\/td>\n-10.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\nWest Virginia<\/td>\n-12.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\nMaine<\/td>\n-12.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\nSouth Dakota<\/td>\n-13.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\nPennsylvania<\/td>\n-13.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30<\/td>\nNew York<\/td>\n-13.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\nColorado<\/td>\n-14.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\nIowa<\/td>\n-14.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\nNew Jersey<\/td>\n-14.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nIllinois<\/td>\n-15.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\nMontana<\/td>\n-17.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36<\/td>\nIndiana<\/td>\n-19.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nNebraska<\/td>\n-20.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\nNevada<\/td>\n-20.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\nArizona<\/td>\n-22.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\nMaryland<\/td>\n-22.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nMassachusetts<\/td>\n-22.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nWisconsin<\/td>\n-25.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\nNew Hampshire<\/td>\n-26.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\nCalifornia<\/td>\n-27.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\nOregon<\/td>\n-28.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\nHawaii<\/td>\n-30.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\nAlaska<\/td>\n-30.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\nNew Mexico<\/td>\n-35.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\nVermont<\/td>\n-35.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\nWashington<\/td>\n-36.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
51<\/td>\nWyoming<\/td>\n-38.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n
—<\/th>\n\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 U.S. State Average<\/th>\n-9.6%<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tfoot>\n<\/table>\n

Where Hiring Demand Is Growing Fastest<\/h2>\n

Idaho leads the nation with job openings up 20.5% since 2020, followed by Mississippi and Oklahoma. Georgia (16.0%) and Texas (14.2%) have also posted strong gains, reflecting continued migration toward lower-cost states and expanding regional economies.<\/p>\n

Manufacturing investment is helping drive demand. Billions of dollars tied to semiconductors, EVs, and industrial reshoring have fueled hiring across parts of the South and Midwest. Significant\u00a0population growth<\/a>\u00a0has added another tailwind, boosting both labor supply and consumer demand.<\/p>\n

The map highlights how America\u2019s labor market is increasingly diverging at the state level, with neighboring states often moving in very different directions.<\/p>\n

Why Many Western States Saw Hiring Cool Off<\/h2>\n

Several Western states have seen some of America\u2019s steepest declines in job openings since 2020.<\/p>\n

Wyoming ranks last nationally, with hiring demand down 38.9%, while Washington is close behind at -36.3%. California, Oregon, and Nevada have also posted sizable declines after the rapid hiring surge seen earlier in the decade.<\/p>\n

Much of the slowdown reflects a reversal of pandemic-era expansion, especially across technology and white-collar industries. During 2021 and 2022, many companies aggressively expanded payrolls amid booming demand and cheap capital. Since then, layoffs, higher interest rates, and efficiency-focused cost-cutting have pushed many firms into retrenchment mode.<\/p>\n

California alone has announced more layoffs than any other state since 2022. The result is a labor market that looks very different from the hiring frenzy that defined the post-pandemic recovery.<\/p>\n

What It Means for Workers and the Economy<\/h2>\n

Hiring demand affects more than just how easy it is to find a job. It can influence migration patterns, wage growth, housing demand, and local economic confidence.<\/p>\n

States with stronger hiring markets often attract more workers, investment, and new business formation, reinforcing long-term economic growth. Weaker hiring markets, meanwhile, may experience softer consumer spending and slower labor demand.<\/p>\n

The map increasingly reflects broader economic shifts unfolding across America.\u00a0Lower-cost states<\/a>\u00a0continue attracting people, capital, and industrial investment, while many high-cost markets are adjusting to slower growth after the pandemic-era boom.<\/p>\n

The result is a labor market that is becoming more fragmented geographically, with economic momentum increasingly concentrated in a smaller group of states.<\/p>\n

To learn more about this topic, check out this\u00a0graphic<\/a>\u00a0showing where wealth is moving across America.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nFri, 06\/12\/2026 – 21:20<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

America’s Hiring Map Has Flipped Since 2020 America\u2019s hiring recovery has split into sharply different regional stories since 2020. Some states, including Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas, continue seeing elevated hiring demand years after the pandemic. Others, particularly across parts of the West Coast and Mountain West, have experienced steep declines in job openings. The… Continue reading America’s Hiring Map Has Flipped Since 2020<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":617857,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[20,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-617868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economic-empowerment","category-national-security","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/617868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=617868"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/617868\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/617857"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=617868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=617868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=617868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}