{"id":595730,"date":"2026-05-04T00:25:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-04T00:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=595730"},"modified":"2026-05-04T00:25:00","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T00:25:00","slug":"china-tries-to-assert-dominance-over-canada-after-carney-trade-deal-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=595730","title":{"rendered":"China Tries To Assert Dominance Over Canada After Carney Trade Deal"},"content":{"rendered":"

China Tries To Assert Dominance Over Canada After Carney Trade Deal <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Historically speaking, crawling to communists for help has never been a good idea; there’s always a catch.\u00a0 By extension, making trade deals with China and the CCP from a position of weakness usually ends with diplomatic concessions instead of mere economic concessions.\u00a0 That is to say, the Chinese are less interested in economic benefits, and more interested in political submission.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Canadians are about to speed run this lesson after Prime Minister Mark Carney’s “new strategic partnership” formed with China early this year.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The announcement has been heralded as a pragmatic reset in Canada-China relations after years of tensions, aimed at diversifying Canada\u2019s trade amid U.S. tariffs under Trump.\u00a0 The goals of the deal include increased bilateral trade, agricultural agreements, currency swaps and energy exports.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The problem is, Carney also wants Canada to maintain its relationship with Taiwan, which the CCP views as a violation of their “One China” policy.\u00a0 Not surprisingly, China is already using their newfound economic leverage to pressure Canada to submit<\/a> to their demands on Taiwan.<\/p>\n

Chinese Ambassador to Canada, Wang Di, has warned that the new strategic partnership between Canada and China could be damaged if Canada continues sending parliamentarians (MPs and senators) to Taiwan, or if they continue transiting warships through the Taiwan Strait.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Wang emphasized the One China principle, stating there is “only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China\u2019s territory.” He described Taiwan as a core interest and political foundation for bilateral relations, warning that official engagements by Canadian parliamentarians with Taiwanese officials would be “hurtful.”<\/p>\n

\n

\ud83d\udea8CHINA ISSUES ULTIMATUM\ud83d\udea8<\/p>\n

First, Carney pulls MPs out of Taiwan.<\/p>\n

Now China is warning Canada not to go back – and not to send ships either.<\/p>\n

Carney told Canadians he was dealing with China because the U.S. was “unreliable”.<\/p>\n

So much for a \u201cstrategic partnership.\u201d pic.twitter.com\/HkxF0YFMrP<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Northern Perspective (@NorthrnPrspectv) May 1, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Canadian MPs and senators have long visited Taiwan, including numerous meetings with the president and foreign minister.\u00a0 But, this year their trips to Taiwan have been cut short, with Canada showing a quiet\u00a0willingness to “de-conflict” high-profile visits when they overlap with China diplomacy.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Taiwan’s envoy to Ottawa warned that Canada’s burgeoning attachment to China could put them in a vulnerable position<\/a> and lead to “trade weaponization” by the CCP.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has led his country into economic chaos as one of the few leaders unwilling to negotiate a basic trade deal with the Trump Administration.\u00a0 He should have been the first to make a deal, given that around 75% of Canada’s export economy relies on US markets and there is no viable alternative that will bring anywhere close to the same trade revenues.<\/p>\n

Canada’s housing market is currently in shambles with prices still skyrocketing.\u00a0 Jobs losses are climbing.\u00a0 Factories are shutting down.\u00a0 Food prices are inflating.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

It’s a matter of simple math and basic geography:\u00a0 The US is the largest consumer market by far with 30% of total global buying power.\u00a0 China is around 12% of the global total and their consumer spending is far less liquid (and spread out over a much larger population).\u00a0 Furthermore, shipping goods 6000 miles to China is a lot more expensive and inefficient than shipping goods right across the border to the US.\u00a0 It’s not complicated – making a deal with the US is the superior option.\u00a0<\/p>\n

However, Carney and his globalist ilk are not interested in common sense trade policies, they are engaged in an ideological war with the Trump Administration.\u00a0 This is about an increasingly “woke” and socialist Canadian regime vs an increasingly nationalist and anti-woke US government.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n

Carney has consistently painted the situation between the US and Canada as a war, and he has made it clear he intends to “win”.\u00a0 This means cutting deals with traditional enemies like China; not because it makes sense financially, but because it’s a way to spite Trump and conservatives in America.\u00a0<\/p>\n

In the end, it is a foolish plan which will only end up costing Canadians billions in export revenues and possibly enslave them to eastern geopolitical interests; further inflaming tensions with the US.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nSun, 05\/03\/2026 – 20:25<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

China Tries To Assert Dominance Over Canada After Carney Trade Deal Historically speaking, crawling to communists for help has never been a good idea; there’s always a catch.\u00a0 By extension, making trade deals with China and the CCP from a position of weakness usually ends with diplomatic concessions instead of mere economic concessions.\u00a0 That is… Continue reading China Tries To Assert Dominance Over Canada After Carney Trade Deal<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":595719,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[20,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-595730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economic-empowerment","category-national-security","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/595730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=595730"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/595730\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/595719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=595730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=595730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=595730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}