{"id":595678,"date":"2026-05-03T21:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T21:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=595678"},"modified":"2026-05-03T21:30:00","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T21:30:00","slug":"democrats-melt-down-after-supreme-court-restricts-race-based-gerrymandering-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/?p=595678","title":{"rendered":"Democrats Melt Down After Supreme Court Restricts Race Based Gerrymandering"},"content":{"rendered":"

Democrats Melt Down After Supreme Court Restricts Race Based Gerrymandering <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The response from Democrats<\/strong> to the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down race-based gerrymandering has been predictable – running high in emotion and devoid of objectivity.\u00a0 The Democrat Party has understood for a long time that much of their power comes from inserting themselves as the spokespeople for the supposed “have-nots”.\u00a0 Racial hysteria being a key weapon in their arsenal to push the ongoing socialization of America.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Its the reason why left-wing NGO’s have been dumping millions of dollars into the very “hate groups” they claim to be fighting against.\u00a0 Leftists need racism as a bogeyman; they have no power without it.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

It makes sense that Democrats are clinging to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which\u00a0prohibits voting practices (including redistricting maps) that result in denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of race.\u00a0 The assumption being that minorities (specifically black Americans) require rigged districts where they are the majority in order to maintain power in government.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This obviously benefits Democrats, with around 83% of blacks voting blue in recent elections.\u00a0 Predominantly black districts in states across the US have acted as assured seats in the House for Dems since 1965.\u00a0 In 1982, Congress strengthened Section 2 by amending it to clarify that plaintiffs only need to prove that a voting practice has a discriminatory result (effect), not just the intent.<\/p>\n

Republicans sided with Democrats in a grand virtue signal, but the results of the strengthened VRA have harmed conservatives ever since.\u00a0\u00a0The Supreme Court’s recent 6-3 decision\u00a0in Louisiana v. Callais ends this 45-year-long mistake, at least, for the most part.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n

This is what it looks like to stand up when democracy is on the line! Florida Rep. Angie Nixon disrupted a special session to protest gerrymandering, declaring, \u201cThis is a violation of the Constitution.\u201d We must continue to protect the power of the people\u2019s vote! \u270a\ud83c\udfff<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udfa5:\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/g0lPRcSmGQ<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Ben Crump (@AttorneyCrump) April 29, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The decision sets a precedent which largely eliminates the use of frivolous race-based challenges to redistricting maps and will lead to a loss of 12-19 House seats for Democrats over the next two years.\u00a0 States which are planning to adjust their maps in light of the Supreme Court ruling include Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Alabama.\u00a0 A few other red states are looking into potential changes before 2028.<\/p>\n

The Democrat reaction has been an absolute meltdown.\u00a0 Impending district map changes threaten a loss of around 12 seats in the near term.<\/p>\n

\n

This is what the Supreme Court conservative supermajority just enabled. pic.twitter.com\/iBS2ArVGBD<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Senate Judiciary Democrats \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@JudiciaryDems) April 30, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The underlying narrative promoted by the political left is that the ruling will result in black Americans losing the right to vote.\u00a0 Chuck Schumer insinuates this in his frantic response, calling the decision a “return to Jim Crow”.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n

“A despicable decision that is a return to Jim Crow.”<\/p>\n

No, what Democrats want is a return to ‘Jim Snow.’<\/p>\n

They aim to disenfranchise white voters with racially discriminatory gerrymandering.<\/p>\n

No racial discrimination means no racial discrimination. Get it? pic.twitter.com\/lxcfH3jg0H<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) April 29, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is, of course, a fallacy.\u00a0 No black citizen is losing their right to vote.\u00a0 In fact, the Supreme Court ruling confirms that black voters and white voters are equal and that rigged districts based on race are not necessary.\u00a0 Raging over the proposition of losing political power, Democrats are now calling for “packing the courts” as a means to dilute the Supreme Court and assert total control over districts and elections (a typical appeal to lawfare).\u00a0<\/p>\n

Hakeem Jeffries called the Supreme Court a disgrace and said “everything is on the table” to undermine their decision.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n

WEAPONIZATION: Democrats, dissatisfied with Supreme Court rulings, have decided they will simply keep adding judges until they find a court that will rule in their favor. Hakeem Jeffries admits that once they\u2019ve packed the court they eliminate filibuster. pic.twitter.com\/3xlO8yoiGm<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 @amuse (@amuse) April 30, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Other Dems echoed this strategy.\u00a0 Their plan?\u00a0 If they can’t rig districts, they will rig the courts.<\/p>\n

\n

Term limits for the Supreme Court.
\nEnforce a binding Code of Ethics.
\nImpeach these corrupt justices.
\nExpand the Court.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@RepRashida) April 30, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It should be noted that the political left only calls for these kinds of extreme measures when the court rules in favor of conservatives.\u00a0 Objective positions and nuances within court decisions are not tolerated.\u00a0 The threat is clear:\u00a0 “Rule with us, or we will get revenge…”<\/p>\n

Other left-wing politicians argue that the Supreme Court “has no authority” to change the VRA because they are not “elected”.\u00a0 When Democrats start to sound like activist libertarians, you know they’re scared.<\/p>\n

\n

Raphael Warnock is giving AOC a run for her money on saying stupid shit!!<\/p>\n

\u201cNo one elected this court\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s really NOT up to the Supreme Court\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s like these morons have no clue how the three branches of government work. pic.twitter.com\/hRlckmGYdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 SaltyGoat (@SaltyGoat17) April 30, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In the sprint to the Midterms the district changes will likely be minimal, but enough to potentially thwart a Democrat majority.\u00a0 In 2028, the game could change dramatically.\u00a0\u00a0Former President Barack Obama was lambasted for attacking the Supreme Court ruling, just days after cutting ads for a Virginia effort to transform that state’s map into a 10-1 Democratic advantage.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Top Illinois Democrats called the precedent<\/a> a\u00a0\u2018crushing blow to our democracy’, despite the fact that Illinois is widely considered gerrymandered to benefit Democrats.\u00a0\u00a0It’s only okay when they do it, not when conservatives do it.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

The Democrat response is a reminder that, if the political left ever returns to substantial government power as they had under the Biden Administration, they will break every rule and violate every principle in order to keep control.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nSun, 05\/03\/2026 – 17:30<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Democrats Melt Down After Supreme Court Restricts Race Based Gerrymandering The response from Democrats to the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down race-based gerrymandering has been predictable – running high in emotion and devoid of objectivity.\u00a0 The Democrat Party has understood for a long time that much of their power comes from inserting themselves as… Continue reading Democrats Melt Down After Supreme Court Restricts Race Based Gerrymandering<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":595669,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[18,19,10,21,12,11,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-595678","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cancel-culture","category-censorship","category-civil-liberties","category-election-integrity","category-equal-justice","category-free-speech","category-religious-freedom","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/595678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=595678"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/595678\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/595669"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=595678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=595678"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buglecall.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=595678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}